Introduction
The rhizosphere is the area of soil that
surrounds plant roots and is influenced by the presence of living plant roots.
It is a dynamic region of the soil where plants interact with microorganisms,
and it plays a crucial role in maintaining the health of the soil and the
surrounding ecosystem. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are a group
of bacteria that live in the rhizosphere and provide benefits to plants (de la Fuente
Cantó et al., 2020; Egamberdieva et al., 2015; Gupta et al., 2015; Pattnaik
& Busi, 2019; Shi et al., 2015; Subrahmanyam et al., 2020).
This Blog will explore the connection between
PGPR, ecosystems, and biodiversity, drawing on recent research and articles.
The
Benefits of PGPR
PGPR are known for their ability to promote
plant growth by several mechanisms, including nitrogen fixation, solubilization
of phosphorus, production of plant growth hormones, and suppression of plant
pathogens. These bacteria form a mutualistic relationship with plants, whereby
they provide nutrients and growth factors to the plant, and in return, they
receive a carbon source from the plant. PGPR can also improve soil structure,
increase water-holding capacity, and enhance the bioavailability of nutrients to
plants (Bhatt &
Bhatt, 2021; Grover et al., 2021; Gupta et al., 2015; Kumar et al., 2015).
The use of PGPR as a natural alternative to
chemical fertilizers has gained increasing attention in recent years due to
their potential to improve crop yields, reduce fertilizer costs, and promote
sustainable agriculture (Gouda et al.,
2018; Kumari & Singh, 2020). Furthermore, the use of PGPR has the added
benefit of reducing environmental pollution caused by the excessive use of
chemical fertilizers (Arjumend et
al., 2022; Guo et al., 2020).
PGPR
and Ecosystems
The benefits of PGPR extend beyond individual
plants to entire ecosystems. The microbial community in the soil plays a
crucial role in maintaining soil health and fertility, and a diverse microbial
community is important for ecosystem stability (Ju et al.,
2019; Kumari et al., 2019; Moore et al., 2022).
Research has shown that the use of PGPR can
increase the abundance and diversity of beneficial microorganisms in the soil,
leading to improved soil health and increased biodiversity. For example, a study
conducted by (Wang &
Huang, 2021) found that the use of PGPR in rice paddies
increased soil microbial diversity and altered the microbial community composition.
The researchers concluded that the use of PGPR could promote the development of
a more stable and diverse microbial community in the soil, which could lead to increased
ecosystem resilience.
PGPR
and Biodiversity
Biodiversity is a critical component of
healthy ecosystems, and the use of PGPR can contribute to the maintenance and
enhancement of biodiversity. The presence of PGPR in the rhizosphere can
promote the growth of plants, which can provide habitat and food for a wide
range of organisms. Furthermore, the use of PGPR can reduce the need for
chemical fertilizers, which can have negative effects on biodiversity by
reducing the abundance and diversity of soil organisms (Khanna et al.,
2021; Miralles-Wilhelm, 2021; Zainuddin et al., 2022).
A study conducted by (Lehman et al.,
2015) investigated the effects of PGPR on the
biodiversity of a grassland ecosystem. The researchers found that the use of
PGPR increased plant diversity and biomass, which in turn led to an increase in
the diversity and abundance of insects, spiders, and soil microorganisms. The
study concluded that the use of PGPR could have significant positive effects on
biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Challenges
and limitations
Despite the potential benefits of PGPR, there
are some challenges and limitations to their use. One of the major challenges
is the complexity of the microbial community in the soil, which can make it
difficult to predict the effects of PGPR on soil health and plant growth.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of PGPR can be influenced by various factors,
such as soil type, climate, and plant species, which can make it challenging to
develop a one-size-fits-all approach to the use of PGPR (Alori et al.,
2017; Fierer et al., 2021; Mokrani et al., 2022).
Another limitation of the use of PGPR is the
lack of regulation and standardization in the production and application of
PGPR products. This can lead to inconsistencies in the quality and efficacy of
PGPR products, which can make it difficult for farmers and growers to determine
the best product to use for their specific needs. In addition, the lack of regulation
can also lead to the proliferation of ineffective or even harmful products on
the market, which can have negative effects on soil health and plant growth (Kumar &
Singh, 2015; Naveed et al., 2015; O'Callaghan et al., 2022).
Another challenge in the use of PGPR is the
potential for unintended consequences. For example, the use of PGPR can alter
the composition of the microbial community in the soil, which can have
unintended effects on other organisms in the ecosystem. In addition, the use of
PGPR can also lead to the development of resistant strains of bacteria, which
can have negative effects on the long-term efficacy of PGPR products (Di Salvo et
al., 2018; Khatoon et al., 2020).
Furthermore, the use of PGPR can also have
limitations in terms of scalability and cost-effectiveness. While the use of
PGPR can be a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to chemical
fertilizers, the production and application of PGPR products can be expensive
and labor-intensive, which can make it difficult for small-scale farmers to
adopt this approach (Mohan et al.,
2021; Zvinavashe, 2022).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the rhizosphere is a dynamic
region of the soil where plant-microbe interactions play a crucial role in
maintaining the health of the soil and the surrounding ecosystem. PGPR are a
group of bacteria that provide benefits to plants by promoting plant growth and
improving soil health. The use of PGPR can also have positive effects on
ecosystem stability and biodiversity. However, there are also challenges and
limitations to the use of PGPR, including the complexity of the microbial
community in the soil, the lack of regulation and standardization in the
production and application of PGPR products, and the potential for unintended
consequences. Despite these challenges, the use of PGPR has the potential to
promote sustainable agriculture and contribute to the maintenance and
enhancement of biodiversity.
References:
Alori, E. T., Dare, M. O., &
Babalola, O. O. (2017). Microbial inoculants for soil quality and plant health.
Sustainable agriculture reviews,
281-307.
Arjumend, T.,
Sarıhan, E. O., & Yıldırım, M. U. (2022). Plant-bacterial symbiosis: an
ecologically sustainable agriculture production alternative to chemical
fertilizers.
Bhatt, K., &
Bhatt, P. (2021). Rhizospheric biology: alternate tactics for enhancing
sustainable agriculture. Phytomicrobiome
interactions and sustainable agriculture, 164-186.
de la Fuente
Cantó, C., Simonin, M., King, E., Moulin, L., Bennett, M. J., Castrillo, G.,
& Laplaze, L. (2020). An extended root phenotype: the rhizosphere, its
formation and impacts on plant fitness. The
Plant Journal, 103(3), 951-964.
Di Salvo, L. P.,
Ferrando, L., Fernández-Scavino, A., & GarcÃa de Salamone, I. E. (2018).
Microorganisms reveal what plants do not: wheat growth and rhizosphere
microbial communities after Azospirillum brasilense inoculation and nitrogen
fertilization under field conditions. Plant
and soil, 424, 405-417.
Egamberdieva, D.,
Shrivastava, S., & Varma, A. (2015). Plant-growth-promoting
rhizobacteria (PGPR) and medicinal plants (Vol. 42): Springer.
Fierer, N., Wood,
S. A., & de Mesquita, C. P. B. (2021). How microbes can, and cannot, be
used to assess soil health. Soil Biology
and Biochemistry, 153, 108111.
Gouda, S., Kerry,
R. G., Das, G., Paramithiotis, S., Shin, H.-S., & Patra, J. K. (2018).
Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable
development in agriculture. Microbiological
research, 206, 131-140.
Grover, M.,
Bodhankar, S., Sharma, A., Sharma, P., Singh, J., & Nain, L. (2021). PGPR
mediated alterations in root traits: way toward sustainable crop production. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4,
618230.
Guo, J.,
Muhammad, H., Lv, X., Wei, T., Ren, X., Jia, H., . . . Hua, L. (2020).
Prospects and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to mitigate
soil metal contamination: A review. Chemosphere,
246, 125823.
Gupta, G.,
Parihar, S. S., Ahirwar, N. K., Snehi, S. K., & Singh, V. (2015). Plant
growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for
development of sustainable agriculture. J
Microb Biochem Technol, 7(2), 096-102.
Ju, W., Liu, L.,
Fang, L., Cui, Y., Duan, C., & Wu, H. (2019). Impact of co-inoculation with
plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and rhizobium on the biochemical responses
of alfalfa-soil system in copper contaminated soil. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 167, 218-226.
Khanna, K., Ohri,
P., Bhardwaj, R., & Ahmad, P. (2021). Unsnarling plausible role of plant
growth-promoting rhizobacteria for mitigating Cd-toxicity from plants: An
environmental safety aspect. Journal of
Plant Growth Regulation, 1-29.
Khatoon, Z.,
Huang, S., Rafique, M., Fakhar, A., Kamran, M. A., & Santoyo, G. (2020).
Unlocking the potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on soil health
and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Journal of environmental management, 273, 111118.
Kumar, A.,
Bahadur, I., Maurya, B., Raghuwanshi, R., Meena, V., Singh, D., & Dixit, J.
(2015). Does a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance agricultural
sustainability. J Pure Appl Microbiol, 9(1),
715-724.
Kumar, S., &
Singh, A. (2015). Biopesticides: present status and the future prospects. J Fertil Pestic, 6(2), 100-129.
Kumari, B.,
Mallick, M., Solanki, M. K., Solanki, A. C., Hora, A., & Guo, W. (2019).
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): modern prospects for sustainable
agriculture. Plant Health Under Biotic
Stress: Volume 2: Microbial Interactions, 109-127.
Kumari, R., &
Singh, D. P. (2020). Nano-biofertilizer: an emerging eco-friendly approach for
sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 90,
733-741.
Lehman, R. M.,
Cambardella, C. A., Stott, D. E., Acosta-Martinez, V., Manter, D. K., Buyer, J.
S., . . . Halvorson, J. J. (2015). Understanding and enhancing soil biological
health: the solution for reversing soil degradation. Sustainability, 7(1), 988-1027.
Miralles-Wilhelm,
F. (2021). Nature-based solutions in
agriculture: Sustainable management and conservation of land, water and
biodiversity: Food & Agriculture Org.
Mohan, I., Goria,
K., Dhar, S., Kothari, R., Bhau, B., & Pathania, D. (2021).
Phytoremediation of heavy metals from the biosphere perspective and solutions. Pollutants and Water Management: Resources,
Strategies and Scarcity, 95-127.
Mokrani, S.,
Nabti, E.-h., & Cruz, C. (2022). Recent Trends in Microbial Approaches for
Soil Desalination. Applied Sciences, 12(7),
3586.
Moore, J. A.,
Abraham, P. E., Michener, J. K., Muchero, W., & Cregger, M. A. (2022).
Ecosystem consequences of introducing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to
managed systems and potential legacy effects. New phytologist, 234(6), 1914-1918.
Naveed, M.,
Mehboob, I., Shaker, M. A., Hussain, M. B., & Farooq, M. (2015).
Biofertilizers in Pakistan: initiatives and limitations. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 17(3), 411-420.
O'Callaghan, M.,
Ballard, R. A., & Wright, D. (2022). Soil microbial inoculants for
sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities. Soil Use and Management, 38(3), 1340-1369.
Pattnaik, S. S.,
& Busi, S. (2019). Rhizospheric fungi: diversity and potential
biotechnological applications. Recent
Advancement in White Biotechnology Through Fungi: Volume 1: Diversity and
Enzymes Perspectives, 63-84.
Shi, S., Nuccio,
E., Herman, D. J., Rijkers, R., Estera, K., Li, J., . . . Brodie, E. L. (2015).
Successional trajectories of rhizosphere bacterial communities over consecutive
seasons. MBio, 6(4), e00746-00715.
Subrahmanyam, G.,
Kumar, A., Sandilya, S. P., Chutia, M., & Yadav, A. N. (2020). Diversity,
plant growth promoting attributes, and agricultural applications of
rhizospheric microbes. Plant microbiomes
for sustainable agriculture, 1-52.
Wang, L., &
Huang, D. (2021). Soil microbial community composition in a paddy field with
different fertilization managements. Canadian
journal of microbiology, 67(12), 864-874.
Zainuddin, N.,
Keni, M. F., Ibrahim, S. A. S., & Masri, M. M. M. (2022). Effect of
integrated biofertilizers with chemical fertilizers on the oil palm growth and
soil microbial diversity. Biocatalysis
and agricultural biotechnology, 39, 102237.
Zvinavashe, A. T.
(2022). A Bioinspired Approach to
Engineer the Seed Microenvironment. Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.
About the Authors: Qudrat Ullah and Etisam
Mazhar are the MPhil scholars of Environmental Sciences at Government College
University Faisalabad, Pakistan.
0 Comments